I do not see many benefits to
planned obsolescence because this really does bother me when I’m buying
electronics or think about buying a car in the future. Planned obsolescence which is “artificial
shortening of the lifespan of consumer commodities” (Lecture 5), is basically
planning to break something one just bought, thus in a way wastes money,
especially when this is not worth the price.
I’m mostly against this because I’m a consumer and never a salesman who
tries to make a living by having others buy from me. However, salesmen, whether
door to door people or corporate companies, depends on a certain degree of
planned obsolescence because they need to make a profit. In this way planned
obsolescence benefits the companies and when the company does well, it can open
more job opportunities for others, thus benefiting common people such as
myself. This whole cycle is basically economics and keeping the economy moving.
This can relate to how Loos writes “the rapid changes in fashion provide
employment for millions” (Loos, “Ornament and Crime,” pp.172). Here is
referring to the fashion industry, but it can be applied to all sorts of
businesses if “fashion” is replaced with new trends. Thus, when a product
breaks in a short amount of time, the owner will probably either want the new
and “improved,” as advertisement claims, version, or they would want to try
another product completely new. Either way, the owner would buy something
again, thus, stimulating the economy.
Another
benefit I see here is that because this concept exists and is applied, this
keeps design, creativity, and new ideas moving and developing. If everyone kept
all their belongings for such a long time, no one would buy much anymore, thus
manufacturing companies would not only lose business, but they would not have
to even care about thinking of coming up with a new idea. New ideas is what
made humans so advanced. It is because of creativity and wanting to change that
there is new technology and cures for diseases, etc. Without throwing things
away or making things from the past old, there would be no new ideas and no one
would follow them, thus, society would not be moving forward. Change in this
case is good because thinking back, I’m sure everyone gets excited at new
things or is amazed when he or she sees a new toy in the market when he or she
was a child, or when the new IPhone 5 that recently came out.
The harmful
and negative side towards planned obsolescence is that manufacturers are acting
like con men because from my experience, no advertisement would ever point out
that a product will break in a certain amount of time. In addition, companies
are counting on their products to give out on their nice customers who probably
over paid for their product with their money that they worked hard for. Well,
maybe not everyone has to work so hard to earn their money, but I do. Thus, I
get disappointed at times when products are not in great quality and even then,
I’m still skeptical about spending my money on something that seems to be in good
quality because of this technique of planned obsolescence.